England are in the semi-finals and almost nothing about how they got there will reassure anyone who watched it, other than the mentality that has been present throughout the tournament. In the searing Miami heat, they were second best to Norway for long stretches, went behind to a Schjelderup strike just after the half hour and were rescued twice by Jude Bellingham, who equalised in first-half stoppage time and struck again three minutes into extra time. The numbers are damning for a side that won. England did not register a single shot on target in the second half, they posted one of the lowest second-half expected goals figures of the entire tournament and the game's first shot of any kind did not arrive until the twenty-ninth minute, the longest wait for an opening shot at these finals.

But there is credit to be found and it belongs mostly to the back line and to a game plan that kept Erling Haaland quiet, making England the first side to keep him off the scoresheet in a competitive international since October 2024. But keeping a star striker quiet is not the same as controlling a game, and England did not control this one. What follows is how Norway repeatedly got at them, why England's own structure kept creating problems and the single quality that actually won the tie, which was a willingness to take a risk in the two moments that mattered.

England (4-2-3-1): Pickford; Konsa, Stones, Guéhi, O'Reilly; Anderson, Rice; Madueke, Bellingham, Gordon; Kane.
Norway (4-3-3): Nyland; Ryerson, Ajer, Heggem, Wolfe; Berg, Berge, Ødegaard; Schjelderup, Haaland, Sørloth.

Norway arrived with the approach that had served them so well against Brazil, and made no attempt to hide it. In possession they built in a 4-3-3 with Haaland stretching the line, which opened space in front of England's back four and out of possession they settled into a 4-5-1 mid-block. England, as expected, committed to pressing high up the pitch. That was the central battle of the night, England's high press against a Norway side specifically drilled to play through one and for long spells Norway won it.

The early signs were also familiar from England's own tournament. In the opening stages they again struggled to penetrate in wide areas, with their wingers not receiving enough support. On one side Gordon received the ball and was effectively left in a two against one because O'Reilly was not close enough to affect the move and moments later the same pattern appeared on the other flank when Madueke received. These were the first hints that England's structure, in and out of possession, was going to give Norway openings all night.

The recurring problem and the one that should worry Tuchel most, was how easily Norway played out against England's high press. Time and again England's front line of five was engaged high and beaten by a simple pass into a wide area followed by a bounce back into midfield and England's far-side players were not alert enough to shuffle across and deal with it. The press did not fail because the idea was wrong. It failed because the execution lacked urgency and awareness.

One early example captured it. Madueke was initially in a good position, cutting the passing lane to Odegaard on his blind side while Konsa stayed close enough to press wide if needed, so England were fine. But as the ball moved back and England's front line went to press again, Madueke did not step with them, which allowed Norway's left-back to receive and drive into the space. Had he simply stayed higher and kept blocking the inside lane, Rice could have got across and Konsa could still have pressed wide. It was a small individual lapse that unlocked the whole structure, and it kept happening.

It persisted into the second half and if anything got worse. It remained far too easy for Norway to beat England's first line, and the pattern of playing wide and bouncing back inside kept catching England's far-side players flat. In one revealing moment, with Reece James now on and expected to sit as the covering man in front of the back four, he was caught far too high, having forgotten that role entirely. A Norway player was actively inviting the goalkeeper to launch it towards Haaland for a knockdown into the space James had vacated. James eventually recognised the danger and began to drop, but against a sharper side those repeated openings would have been punished rather than survived. The pressing distances to Norway's key players, the ones capable of receiving and turning, were consistently too large all evening.

England's mid-block carried a structural fault that ran through the whole game. It drifted from a 4-3-3 when they were higher up to a 4-4-2 when they dropped deeper, and the trouble came whenever the ball was worked wide and played over or around Gordon, who then had a long way to travel to recover. That forced Anderson to press out to help the full-back, which meant Rice had to slide across to cover Anderson, and the end result was that Norway's far-side midfielder was left free to receive and turn almost every single time. The far-side free man became the defining feature of England's defending, because Madueke did not consistently get compact and follow Rice's movement to cover that space.

The danger in it was not abstract. The space this opened sat directly in front of the two centre-backs who were occupied with Haaland, and neither could step into it without leaving the most dangerous striker in the tournament. If Norway had been sharper in getting the ball out of the wide zones and into that pocket, they would have had acres to work in. This is partly a question of matching the right profile to the role rather than pure effort, but Madueke could also have been more alert to the situation, and England saw the same pattern repeat countless times in the first half alone.

England's problems were not confined to defending. In possession they showed a poor readiness to the switch throughout, meaning the wide player receiving the ball simply was not ready when he should have been. On one occasion Stones was on the ball with his head up looking for the switch, but O'Reilly was too deep and off the blind side of Norway's right midfielder, a position from which he would still have been onside had he pushed higher. That would have let Stones play over the top rather than into O'Reilly's feet, where Norway could simply shuffle across to meet it.

The same theme showed on the other flank, where Madueke found a genuinely good wide position with plenty of distance from his full-back, only for there to be too little support as the ball travelled, which returned England to the familiar two against one. There were clear solutions available. Rice could have broken into the half-space as the ball travelled with Anderson covering behind him, or Konsa could have made that run with Rice covering, but England again declined the risk. The readiness itself was often the issue, with Gordon on one switch not even facing the play and jogging into the position he should already have taken as Stones received. Tellingly, the single time England did get their winger one against one with proper support in the half-space, they created a good chance, which shows the answer was there and simply underused.

Some of England's difficulty was self-inflicted and stemmed from their in-possession shape. With Anderson operating as a makeshift left-back when England had the ball, he was always going to be tempted to push inside to get involved in the play, and every time he did it left a large space on the far side. O'Reilly, pushed high on the opposite flank, was not covering that space because protecting it was not his job while England were in possession. The consequence was that when England lost the ball, Anderson was not positioned to defend the runner in behind him, and it flashed up as a warning more than once in the first half, including one moment where his eagerness to counter-press left the far side wide open again. It was exactly the kind of structural weakness that needed resolving at half-time before a better side made it count.

For all of that, England won, and the manner of it is the most useful lesson in the whole game. Both goals came from taking a little more risk in precisely the areas they had avoided for most of the night. The equaliser came from attacking an unbalanced Norway block quickly and directly, with a fine touch from Anderson to play into Gordon's space and a clever ball inside that Bellingham took with an excellent first touch before finishing low. It was the reward for playing forward at speed against a defence that had not yet set.

The winner made the point even more sharply. England had not managed a single shot from outside the box all game, and the moment they finally took one, through Morgan Rogers in extra time, it caused Norway an immediate problem. The goalkeeper could not hold the effort, England had runners anticipating exactly that, and Bellingham reacted quickest to turn in the rebound. England manufactured that chance themselves, not through sustained control, but by doing the brave thing they had refused to do for the previous ninety minutes.

This was a poor England performance that ended in a good England result and the two things need to be held together rather than one used to hide the other. They were outplayed for long spells by a Norway side that beat their high press with ease, left a free man on the far side almost at will, and would have won the game with a little more quality in the final third. England's back line deserves credit for keeping Haaland quiet, and Bellingham deserves enormous credit for producing the two moments of belief that settled it, becoming the first player to score twice in consecutive World Cup knockout games since Maradona in 1986. But the lesson England should take into the semi-final is the one thing that actually worked, which is that they threatened only when they took a risk. Argentina will not be as forgiving of the problems that Norway could not quite punish, and England will need to fix their press, their readiness to the switch and the balance of that left side long before they walk out for it.

One game. One breakdown. Every week.

COMMENT "WORLD CUP" and I'll send the full World Cup Tactical Coach Bundle straight to you.

The Tactics Academy Newsletter | Lucas | Coach, Analyst, Founder