The 5 Levels of Tactical Thinking

You will have heard the advice that if you want to understand football properly you need to stop watching the ball. I do not think that is right in my opinion and it has confused a lot of people.

The ball is the organising principle of the entire game. Every player on the pitch positions themselves in relation to where it is, where it is going, and where it might be two passes from now. Ignoring it does not make you a better analyst, it makes you blind to the reference point that everything else is arranged around. Watching the ball is correct and you should keep doing it.

The actual limitation is different and far more specific. Most people watch the individual nearest the ball, form a judgement about that individual and then stop. What they never do is ask whether that action (good or bad) was in hindsight the correct decision, whether that decision served an idea the team was working to, or whether that idea had anything to do with how this particular side is capable of winning a football match.

Every action on a pitch sits inside a chain of purpose with five layers, and the chain only reads properly from the top down.

A coach builds that chain downward. Anyone watching and analysing will naturally build it upward, because all you can see is the bottom layer. Something happens, and from that one visible action you work backwards toward the reason it happened.

The five levels below is a tactical thinking framework which puts this into context.

You see what a player did and judge it. The pass was good or bad, the touch was clean or heavy, the tackle was well timed or late.

This level is not worthless and it is not something you graduate out of, becasue every coach needs to correct certain execution and technical problems. But everything above it depends on seeing the detail accurately and plenty of people who talk fluently about systems cannot tell you whether a first touch set a player up to play forward or forced him to check back.

The most useful vocabulary I know for this layer is the FA's six capabilities of a skilful player, because they replace "good" and "bad" with something you can actually work on. It gives your players better and more actionable feedback.

Scanning. What information the player gathered before the ball arrived and whether they gathered it early enough to use it.

Positioning. Where they were standing before anything happened, which determines what options existed at all.

Movement. How they travelled, including the accelerations and decelerations that create separation rather than simply covering ground.

Timing. When they acted. The same movement made half a second early or late is a different action with a different outcome.

Deception. Whether they disguised their intention well enough that the opponent committed to the wrong thing.

Technique. Whether the execution itself delivered what the decision required.

The limitation of Level 1 is not the observation. But a judgement made here and left here has nowhere to go, because good and bad are verdicts rather than objective football answers.

To Graduate: having named what the player did, ask what was actually available to him rather than what he should have done. Almost every action that looks poor in isolation may have been shaped by something happening away from the ball.

You see the tactic. The shape, the positions, who is where and how the eleven are organised in this phase of play.

This is where most engaged people sit and it is a comfortable place to settle because it is socially rewarding. You can identify a shape, name it and sound informed.

But the thing is, you might be able to describe an arrangement in detail, but you cannot say what it is for. If the answer to why they are set up that way is another description of how they are set up, you are possibly here. Naming an arrangement is a skill, but it is not the same skill as understanding one.

To Graduate: every time you identify an arrangement, finish the sentence with "in order to". They are keeping both central midfielders deep in order to protect the space behind the press. If you cannot finish it, you have found the exact edge of your understanding, which is useful rather than embarrassing.

You reach the intention. You can look at an arrangement and say what it is designed to achieve, what it is designed to deny and what has been given up in order to do it.

This is a real level of competence and it is where good analysis lives. You are no longer describing football, you are explaining it and understanding ‘Why’. You understand that a deep block is not necessarily ‘negative’, but a tactical decision to remove the space in behind, and that the price is conceding territory and time on the ball further from goal.

The ‘trade-off’ recognition starts here and it is what separates Level 3 from Level 2 more than anything else. Every arrangement buys something and pays for it somewhere else. Because you can never have a ‘perfect’ system, there will always be downsides or unfavourable variants, it’s about taking a risk and doing what is right in that moment for your team. E.G, Committing a full back high buys an extra body in attack and costs protection in transition. Stepping a defensive line up buys compression and costs space in behind. At Level 3 you can name both sides of that exchange rather than only noticing the half that produced a goal.

But there are two ceilings to this level.

The first is that the observation is static. You are explaining an arrangement as it stands, in the single frame you happen to be looking at. You are not yet tracking whether it is still working twenty minutes later, or what happens to it when the opponent changes something.

The second is that the read is untethered from the players. You can say what the aim is without being able to say whether it was the right aim for this group of individuals to be pursuing. A perfectly coherent principle aimed at an outcome these eleven players cannot reach is still a failure, and Level 3 has no way of seeing that.

To Graduate: stop assessing the arrangement as a finished picture and start following the consequences of individual actions upward through it. That is where Level 4 begins.

This is where tactical thinking becomes advanced, and it has two halves that work together.

At Level 1 you saw the action. At Level 4 you follow that single action upward and read what it does to the unit around it, and then what that does to the team's ability to achieve its objective.

Take a centre back receiving under moderate pressure and taking a heavy first touch away from where he intended.

At the action level, that is technique and possibly scanning. He did not gather enough information early enough to know which side to open his body toward.

At the unit level, the midfielder in front of him who had already started to turn onto his back foot now has to check back and receive facing his own goal. The two players either side of that midfielder adjust to support him, which drops the whole midfield line five or six yards. The near full back, who had begun an advancing run on the assumption the ball was coming forward, has to stop and reset.

At the team level, the side is now building from deeper than the plan intended. The striker's run in behind is being made from ten yards further away from goal, which makes it less dangerous. The opposition block, which had been in the process of retreating, has been handed the time it needed to settle. And if the ball is turned over in the next two passes, the advancing full back is now the wrong side of the ball rather than ahead of it.

One heavy touch, and the consequence has travelled all the way to the objective of scoring goals. This is what people mean when they say details matter, but saying it that way is useless because it does not tell you how to look. Reading a single action forward through the unit to the team is how you look.

The second half of Level 4 is that you stop reacting to what happened and start running what could happen. Before a passage of play develops, you are already asking the questions.

If their full back pushes higher on that side, who takes responsibility for the space he vacates and is that a swap we are comfortable making. If their nine starts dropping into midfield to receive, does my deepest midfielder follow him or hold his position and what breaks either way. If we concede first here, what actually changes about the plan, and have I decided that in advance or will I be deciding it later.

This is the difference between analysis and preparation. Anticipation is not prediction, it is knowing which paths exist so that none of them arrives as a surprise.

And it only becomes useful if you also know what you can pull. There are four levers:

Player profile. Replace a player with one whose capabilities suit the problem. Not a better player, a differently shaped one. If the issue is that nobody is winning the second ball, the answer is a different profile rather than a different formation.

Structure. Change the arrangement itself. An extra body in midfield, a back three, a wing back rather than a full back. The most visible lever and usually the most disruptive, because it changes several jobs at once.

Individual instruction. Change one player's job without touching anyone else's. Ask the winger to hold width rather than drift inside. Ask the six to screen rather than press. The most underused lever by a distance, because it solves specific problems without the cost of a structural change.

Distances and reference points. Same shape, same personnel, same jobs, different spacing. Press ten yards higher. Sit five yards deeper. Narrow the front two. Nothing on the team sheet changes and the whole game changes.

The ceiling of Level 4 is that all of this still happens in one phase at a time, and largely in your head rather than in a live game. You can anticipate what might happen when you have the ball, or what might happen when you do not, without yet understanding that they are the same problem.

To Graduate: stop treating in possession and out of possession as two separate plans.

This is game management and it is the hardest skill in football.

Most people, including a lot of qualified coaches, hold two separate plans. Here is what we do with the ball and here is what we do without it. And rightly so because your players need to know this information. But you can think about it slightly differently. At Level 5 you understand that they are a single system, because each one determines the other.

Your attacking structure decides your defensive vulnerability the instant you lose the ball. If your build up commits both full backs high, you have chosen a transition problem and you chose it in the attacking plan rather than the defensive one. Where you position your rest defence, whether you counter-press or drop, which area of the pitch you would rather lose the ball in, all of that is decided by the shape you attack in.

It runs the other way too. Your defensive shape determines what attacks are available when you win possession. A deep block wins the ball far from goal and needs runners who can cover ground. A high press wins it close to goal and needs players who can combine quickly in tight space. Choosing a defensive approach is also choosing an attacking one.

Level 5 is being able to hold both phases as one design and see the parts where they meet.

Everything below Level 5 can be done in an armchair with the benefit of knowing the result. Adaptation cannot.

You are deciding with incomplete information, against an opponent who is also adapting, with a clock running and a scoreline pressing on every judgement. The signal you are reading might be a genuine pattern or it might be three coincidences in a row and you have about ninety seconds to decide which.

There is also the part nobody really says, which is that the psychological pressure is real and it distorts your thinking. Being a goal down makes structural problems look like effort problems. Being a goal up makes you protective at exactly the moment the game is asking you to be brave. Managing your own reading of the game is part of the skill.

The practical test is whether you change something before it costs you rather than after. Recognising a problem once it has produced a goal is Level 4 arriving late. Recognising it while it is still only a pattern is Level 5.

The clearest marker of this level is that you can explain the reasoning for any decision at three distances from the ball and name what it costs at each.

On the ball. What options does the player in possession now have, and which one have you made most likely.

Around the ball. What support exists, who can combine, who is available underneath if it goes backwards and how quickly can pressure be applied if it is lost here.

Away from the ball. What is happening on the far side and behind the ball, which space is nobody currently looking at, and what does the rest defence look like if this attack breaks down in four seconds.

Every decision has consequences at all three and most decisions improve one distance while worsening another. Asking a full back to invert improves the picture around the ball and empties the space away from it. Dropping a midfielder between the centre backs improves the picture on the ball and reduces the numbers further forward.

The test of Level 5 is not whether the call was right. It is whether you can say what you gave up to make it, and whether you had accepted that cost before it arrived rather than discovering it afterwards. Because that is ultimately what decision-making is.

Very few people operate here consistently and I would not claim to live here either. It is worth knowing the level exists, because it changes what you are aiming at.

Take a single moment from the next game you watch. One action, one player, one touch. Then go through this process. Keep going and give as much detail as you can until you can’t go any further.

Count how far you got.

Action. You described what the player did and how well he did it. Arrangement. You reached the shape the team was organised in. Aim. You reached what that shape was for and what it gave up to do it. Anticipation. You followed the action up through the unit to the team, or you found yourself asking what happens next and what you would change. Adaptation. You were weighing both phases as one system, or naming the cost of a decision at three distances from the ball.

Time watching does not just move you up this ladder. People watch football closely for twenty years and stay on the second rung throughout, because nothing in the ordinary experience of following the game ever forces you to finish the sentence with "in order to" or “Why” or “What if”. You can take the badges, run sessions every week, watch four games a weekend and still be describing formations rather than explaining them.

What moves you is a structure applied deliberately and repeatedly until the questions run on their own.

EXCITING NEWS!

Over many months I’ve been building The Tactics Academy membership. This is a space for coaches, fans, analysts and players who love tactical analysis to come together, share ideas and even get rewarded in return.

I’m opening doors very soon and below you can join the waitlist where you can here about the launch first. Click below for more info!